This was a quiz that was going around a long time ago. I finally decided that my 'quiz break' had served its time and I was ready to indulge. Here are my results:
To tell you the truth, I half expected that the quiz would tell me that I was a heritic. I thought I would score much higher on modalism, because I view the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as I view my head, torso, and legs. They all co-exist, but they're all God. In other words, I don't feel comfortable with the phrase, "One Being, Three Persons", because I don't feel that the difference between a being and a person in the context of God has been clearly identified. I would be much happier with "One Being, Three Parts", or even "One Person, Three Parts". Apparently I tend towards being a Monophysitist, which makes sense too. I like the idea of a composite nature in Jesus, however I think that composite nature could have pre-existed.
Oh, the joys of ancient theology.
You scored as Chalcedon compliant. You are Chalcedon compliant. Congratulations, you're not a heretic. You believe that Jesus is truly God and truly man and like us in every respect, apart from sin. Officially approved in 451.
Are you a heretic? created with QuizFarm.com |
To tell you the truth, I half expected that the quiz would tell me that I was a heritic. I thought I would score much higher on modalism, because I view the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as I view my head, torso, and legs. They all co-exist, but they're all God. In other words, I don't feel comfortable with the phrase, "One Being, Three Persons", because I don't feel that the difference between a being and a person in the context of God has been clearly identified. I would be much happier with "One Being, Three Parts", or even "One Person, Three Parts". Apparently I tend towards being a Monophysitist, which makes sense too. I like the idea of a composite nature in Jesus, however I think that composite nature could have pre-existed.
Oh, the joys of ancient theology.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home